The Jewel of the Sixth Day: The Imago Dei

There is simply no truth, no doctrine, no idea, that is more fundamental to the Judeo-Christian world view than man made in the image of God, both male and female. Everything from Genesis to Revelation hinges on this one idea. There is no end to the glories of this doctrine; in it are hidden all the answers to all the questions of the human heart. It is the pearl of creation, the jewel of the sixth day.

It is critical for us to understand that nowhere does the text define what the imago dei (Latin for “image of God”) means in humanity. True, the immediate context links the imago dei with dominion (1:26). However, the idea of dominion in and of itself cannot exhaust such an expansive and suggestive idea. This is a critical point; the imago dei is the great human mystery of which our human minds can never get down to the bottom. It is our glory as divine image bearers never to be explained fully, just as, by analogy, we can never explain God, although He is eternal, and we are finite. Therefore, all attempts to reduce this idea down to one aspect of our humanity are bound to fail. All we can do is meditate on it, circle around it, and turn it round and round in our minds and hearts until we begin to see all theology open up through it. The greatest travesty that has happened to our culture when it embraced the secular model of evolution by chance is the loss of this doctrine, and with it the total loss of our identity.

The dual Hebrew words linked together to establish this idea are ṣelem and demût, often translated as “image and likeness.” Scholars understand these two words as a “hendiadys” which means that the two words are placed together to express one idea too rich for one word. In this case, ṣelem means “image” and is even used elsewhere in reference to “idols” which men make. Hence, man is a “miniature,” or “replica” of God, so that when we gaze upon humanity, both male and female, especially when righteous, we are gazing at God. However, the word demût (likeness) necessarily limits this idea so that we must not mistake the Eternal God with mere man; we are “like” God, or analogous to God. (There are theologians who argue that man was made in the ‘image” of God by creation, but must grow into the “likeness” by sanctification. This is not exegetically correct, whatever its theological value may be.) And so it is, it is proper for God to make idols of Himself, but it presumptuous for man to make and idol of God. Idol making is a divine prerogative.

Moreover, we must not limit the divine image to one specific aspect such as our spiritual dimension in contrast to our physicality. It is said that God “breathed” into Adam(‘s clay form) and he became a “living soul” (2:7). The word ‘soul,” here used for the first time, denotes the totality of Adam. Our humanity is by necessity a union of the physical and the spiritual, the body and all that constitutes the inner psychological person. This must include the physical. Now we know that God is not “corporal” as we are (John 4:24). Still, though God is everywhere and fills all things (Jer. 23:24), God is never understood in the Bible as amorphous, a hazy “force” that cannot be “located.” God is everywhere, but He is somewhere, and even the highest of Seraphim will not look fully into the face of uncreated light. So, whatever “form” God takes in the spiritual realm, our bodies are understood to be comparable or compatible with It. As we look ahead, we see that the very doctrines of the incarnation and the resurrection hang upon this doctrine of the imago dei, for Christ, the very image of God, took on our form in the flesh to redeem us with our bodies. Who knows, perhaps Christ Himself formed Adam of clay in His very likeness in the garden, and when He breathed into it, he looked face to face into his own likeness like in a mirror!

No matter how hard our secular culture wants to see humanity as a mere “animal,” it cannot get away with such insipid simplicity. There is something that glows special in humanity, and it takes a thoroughly jaded person not to admit this, or at least a dishonest one. This special glow has a theological name, the “imago dei,” a direct result of intimate contact with the Divine Breath, the jewel of creation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: